Em-URGE-ing Voices

Your urgent thoughts, urging action

Call It Anti-Choice, Not Pro-Life

Posted by

April 14, 2015

From Flickr user William Murphy, "infomatique"

I’ve never understood why “pro-choice” and “pro-life” are considered to be opposites. More specifically, I’ve never understood why people are called pro-life when they would be more accurately referred to as anti-abortion or anti-choice.

Why? Because a lot of “pro-life” people aren’t even what I’d consider to be pro-life.

Breaking the label down, pro-life means that you’re in support of, well, life, just as pro-choice means you’re in support of the right to choose. Making “pro-life” the antithetical adjective to “pro-choice” makes it seem like the two are opposite. But I consider myself to be very much pro-choice and also very much in support of life.

By that, I mean that I support the right to live how you should choose to live. The right to a good life. The right to a healthy life. The right to food and a roof over your head. The right to make decisions for yourself.

I’ve found that typically, people who are anti-choice are also anti-things-that-give-people-a-good-quality-of-life. I don’t mean to generalize because I’m sure there are plenty of people who break this rule, but the most vocal anti-choice individuals I know do not support things like food stamps, universal healthcare, universal childcare, maternity/paternity leave, assistance to the homeless, access to contraception, etc.

These are things that actually improve quality of life. Some, like universal healthcare or food stamps, might even save lives. These are also things that would reduce the rate of abortion considering they might provide the means for a person to support a child they could not otherwise support.

So it’s hard for me to grasp why people who call themselves “pro-life” are not pro-things-that-actually-make-up-a-life.

Besides anti-abortion or anti-choice, another label might be pro-birth. It sometimes seem like the only thing that really matters to some individuals is that the fetus is born. They’ll fight tooth and nail for the right of that fetus to be born, but once it is, they’ll ignore its need for help to have a good life.

If we go a step further, people who don’t support legal, safe and easily accessible abortions can’t even be considered pro-life because of the danger of illegal and unsafe abortions. Surgical abortion is one of the safest medical procedures and death rates from abortion are now rare since Roe v. Wade passed.

Returning to a system of back-alley abortions would actually increase the risk of bodily harm and death, and that’s not pro-life at all. Additionally, many anti-choice individuals I’ve spoken to—again, this does not represent all of them—do not support things that would actually reduce the abortion rate, namely comprehensive sex education and access to low-cost or free birth control.

In addition, the term “pro-life” seems like such a positive term that these people sound like they’re in the right. You can’t argue with someone who believes in saving lives

It seems like such a trivial thing to point out, and I often feel nitpicky when I correct someone—“Hey, can you actually say ‘anti-choice’ instead of ‘pro-life’?” But as a Feminspire article, “Why The ‘Pro-Life’ Movement is Not Pro-Life,” says—“The fact that we’ve allowed this movement to label themselves something that is a complete lie is a victory for them. If you’re an activist for reproductive freedom, every time you use “pro-life” you’re hurting your cause.”

The words that we use are important. They give power and meaning to the causes that we fight for and if we allow people to incorrectly label themselves, to refer to themselves as something that they are not, we’re doing the reproductive justice movement a disservice.

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.